Consumer Proposal vs Bankruptcy in Canada 2025

Updated March 2025 · 10 min read · bremo.io

When you're struggling with debt in Canada, consumer proposals and personal bankruptcy are the two most powerful formal debt relief tools available under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). Both are administered by Licensed Insolvency Trustees and both trigger an immediate stay of proceedings. But they work very differently — and the right choice depends on your income, assets, and goals.

Both options are administered by Licensed Insolvency Trustees (LITs). Initial consultations are free. Always get a professional assessment before deciding.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FactorConsumer ProposalBankruptcy
Debt limitUp to $250,000 unsecuredNo limit
Asset protectionKeep all assetsNon-exempt assets may be sold
DurationUp to 60 months (5 years)9–36 months depending on situation
Credit ratingR7 on included accountsR9 on included accounts
Credit report stay3 yrs post-completion or 6 yrs from filing6 yrs post-discharge (14 yrs if 2nd)
Surplus incomeNot applicable50% of income over threshold paid to trustee
Amount repaidPortion of debt (typically 20–70%)Non-exempt assets only; most unsecured debt wiped
Public recordYes (insolvency registry)Yes (insolvency registry)
Professional licencesLess impactSome professions restrict bankrupts
Creditor approval neededYes — majority by dollar value must acceptNo

When a Consumer Proposal Makes More Sense

When Bankruptcy Makes More Sense

The Surplus Income Equation

One of the most important — and often misunderstood — comparisons is surplus income. In bankruptcy, if your net income exceeds approximately $2,700/month (for a single person in 2025), you pay 50% of the excess to your trustee every month, and your bankruptcy is extended to 21 months. This can make bankruptcy surprisingly costly for middle-income earners.

Example: If you earn $4,000/month net and your threshold is $2,700, you pay 50% of $1,300 = $650/month for 21 months = $13,650 total. A consumer proposal for a similar amount might offer more predictability and slightly better credit outcomes.

Asset Protection: The Biggest Differentiator

In a consumer proposal, you keep all your assets — no exceptions. In bankruptcy, the trustee may take non-exempt assets. If you own a home with significant equity above the provincial exemption, have a car worth more than the exemption, or have non-RRSP investments, bankruptcy could cost you more than you expect.

Credit Impact in Detail

Both options damage your credit in the short term, but they differ in how long and how severely:

In practice, the credit recovery timelines are not dramatically different, especially if you actively rebuild during the process. Many people are back to good credit within 2–3 years post-discharge from either process.

Professional Licence Considerations

Certain licensed professions in Canada have rules around bankruptcy — lawyers, accountants, some financial advisors, and trustee applicants may face restrictions or disclosure requirements. A consumer proposal generally has fewer professional implications. Check with your regulatory body before filing.

The Bottom Line

For most Canadians with steady income and some assets to protect, a consumer proposal is the better option — it costs more in absolute dollars but preserves assets, has a slightly better credit impact, and carries less social stigma. For those with very low income, no assets, and crushing debt, bankruptcy offers the fastest and most complete relief.

The best way to decide is a free consultation with a Licensed Insolvency Trustee, who will run the numbers for both options and give you an honest recommendation based on your specific situation.

Start Fresh With Free Banking

Regardless of your credit history, KOHO is available to all Canadians. No monthly fees, no minimum balance, no credit check to open. Use code 45ET55JSYA for a bonus when you sign up.

Open KOHO Free — Code 45ET55JSYA