The accused was working on a laptop physically mounted to the steering wheel with a bracket and brace at 92 Oxford Crescent — his regular daily work location.
Vehicle state: Engine off. Gear: Park. Speed: 0 km/h. Accused was not the owner and had no access to keys.
The arresting officer confirmed the laptop at ~14:42:14: "Put your laptop down."
This statement was made on camera and audio at 14:41:06 EDT — one minute and one second before the arrest was announced.
It is a clear, unambiguous exculpatory statement that directly addresses every element of the care or control charge.
The right to counsel was invoked at 14:27:44 EDT. The officer continued demanding ID 11 seconds later.
R v Manninen — all questioning and demands must cease immediately upon invocation. The officer's continued demands are a breach from the first second.
Kruse Law was named during Interview Room 9 questioning. Three separate named requests were made during custody. Zero responses to any of them.
First police contact with Kruse Law: 07:48 AM March 16 — 17 hours and 20 minutes later.
At 14:42:02, a CEW (taser) was pressed to the accused's shoulder. At 14:42:05:
"You're going to tase me for sleeping in my car in front of my house?"
"YES."
Cst. Steffler's arrest booking report: "Conductive Weapon used: No."
Physical extraction by three officers follows at ~14:42:30. Booking report: "Force used: No."
Left: ceiling camera D181. Right: wall camera D180. Duration: 2 minutes 36 seconds.
The accused was on the designated bench in the hallway outside the breath room door for the entire session. Cst. Steffler stood in the doorframe. The accused's chair inside the room was empty throughout. s.10(b) breach at this moment: 2 hours, 1 minute, 1 second.
Zero prior convictions. The CPIC printout and the false-record documents are in the same Crown disclosure package. The contradiction is self-contained within Crown's own materials.
mg/100mL. Zero blood alcohol. Crown's own instrument. Subject Test 15:44:42 EDT. Count 1 (over-80mg) has no evidentiary foundation anywhere in disclosure.
Crown counsel (Dueck) endorsed Steffler's false record in the ACSF. The Crown is not a passive recipient — Crown participated in the false instrument. Abuse of process.
Intoxilyzer: 000 mg/100mL. Eyes closed during demand, instrument not presented. R v Bernshaw — no valid demand, no valid refusal. Count 1 and Count 2 collapse.
Invoked 14:27:44. Never discharged. 3 named requests — zero responses. Duty counsel redirect. Bail under breach. Manninen + Willier + Bartle.
4 officers + Crown counsel each placed false prior convictions in the record. CPIC: NO HIT. R v Nixon 2011 SCC 34 — abuse of process — stay warranted.
Laptop on wheel. Engine off. No keys. Not owner. 3 witnesses + Crown's complainant. Tesla: 0 km/h. R v Boudreault 2012 SCC 56.
GPS stationary. 0 km/h. Odometer unchanged. Gear: Park. Ignition: Off. No trip logged. This evidence is not challengeable. The arrest is documented from 9 angles for 19 minutes and 17 seconds.
Required before Charter hearing dates can be scheduled. Confirmed by Trial Coordinator Esther Turner.
File managed by H-P surname Crown. Jane Young takes no direct contact. Get name on record.
Crown was waiting on police disclosure at May CPT. Ask if received. Re-offer Tesla footage for quiet resolution.
No front seat condition agreed under s.10(b) breach without counsel. R v Bartle. Disproportionate.